Fire is a disturbance agent across landscapes. Fire has occurred often enough through time over our forests, rangeland, meadows, and wetlands that plants and animals have adapted to it and in some cases depend on it. In this module, students will create a fire-adapted animal, plant, or house and work with a group to determine the fire regime and fire ecology of their creation. Students will also examine case studies and work with a partner or small group to create a poster illustrating living and nonliving relationships to fire. Students will define common vocabulary used when discussing fire ecology.
Apply concepts learned in this module to design a landscape for your area with natural vegetation adapted to your local climatic and topographic conditions—paying close attention to microsites. Monitor the growth and development—and resistance to weather and disease effects of these plants and compare to non-natives.
Fire ecology is a branch of ecology that concentrates on the origins of wildland fire and its relationship to the nonliving (abiotic) and living (biotic) environment (together making up the ecosystem). We also propose that the definition of fire ecology applies to the relationship of a structure fire to its environment.
Fire does not have a personality, is neither evil nor good. Fire can save life and take it. Fire can be beneficial and detrimental. Our history has ingrained into us a fear of fire more than a respect for it. How many of us have a history of family members or neighbors negatively affected by a forest or house fire?
In the 1930s, early fire researchers in the southeastern United States challenged the public’s predominant negative feeling towards fire. They argued that controlled, prescribed fire was essential to the wildlife and the longleaf pine forests of that region. This was one of the first times fire was perceived by credible science as having a benefit to ecosystems and not entirely negative or harmful. Fire ecology was born with this understanding. The scientists would have used the words “ecosystem” and “ecology” then, but for the fact that these terms first appeared in 1935 (credited to George Tansley—1871–1955).
Plants take in energy from the sun during photosynthesis (Figure 1). Combustion burns the organic matter stored in plants and releases energy (Figure 2).
Fire is a chemical reaction. It is a natural disturbance process and a component of an ecosystem. How fire fits into and reacts with an ecosystem requires an understanding of systems. Look beyond an ecosystem’s present state for that understanding. Build on that understanding with an investigation of:
Fire has a place throughout. Fire, similar to floods, earthquakes, storms, and other disturbances, is a dynamic force of nature that induces change in an ecosystem. When the Fire Triangle is complete, fire will occur Figure 3). When the Fire Behavior Triangle is complete—how a fire progresses and to the intensity and severity it burns across the landscape or in a structure becomes predictable—the relationship of fire to the nonliving and living components of an ecosystem begins to make sense.
Disturbance interacts with environmental variables such as slope, elevation, aspect, wind patterns, precipitation, and terrain, to shape succession modifications of vegetation structure and composition (Figure 4). All living things have some traits that are adaptations to disturbances and constraints of their environments. Disturbances include physical and biological disturbances, of which fire is one. Hurricanes, floods, and insect and disease epidemics are other forms of cyclic disturbances to which vegetation has adapted. Human disturbances such as road building, heavy logging, agriculture, housing developments, cities, and introduction of invasive species occurring over a long-enough period of time will influence how species adapt. Human disturbances can severely alter a natural community.
There is a fire ecology to structure fires. Since the beginning, fires have historically been beneficial in our dwellings, especially in cold climates. Cooking, warming, and aesthetics are all good and common uses of fires indoors. Conversely, our ancestors found out right away how that welcoming warmth can quickly become detrimental and destructive, consuming everything flammable. The fire ecology of structure fires has a direct relationship, positive or negative, to the abiotic and biotic components either directly within or outside any dwelling or place of work.
Fire dependence applies to species of plants and animals that rely on the effects of fire to make the environment more hospitable for their regeneration, growth, and regrowth. Examples of fire-dependent species are whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) in the alpine forests of the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountains, and longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) found in the southeast (eastern Texas, Virginia, and Florida). Being fire-adapted means plants and animals have behaviors, physical features, and/or characteristics enabling them to live, survive, and sometimes thrive with repeated fire. Examples of fire-adapted species include ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), western larch (Larix occidentalis), and snowbrush ceanothus (Ceanothus velutinus).
The genetic make-up of living organisms constantly strives to mutate and adapt in response to changes in an ecosystem that occur over a long-enough period. The genetic adaptations are manifest in physiologic characteristics. Opportunism, competition, and the basis of survival interact with these adaptations. When change occurs too fast or too intensively, organisms cannot adapt quickly enough and will leave the system, replaced by those organisms that can.
The following are core beliefs of the science of fire ecology from the Association for Fire Ecology:
We also try to adapt our structures to fire. Our ancestors depended on fire within their dwellings for survival. The majority of our dwellings throughout history (and today) are composed of the third side of the fire triangle: fuel.
Throughout history, our dwellings have adapted over time with better building materials for strength and weather resistance—and for fire prevention and fire resistance. As wildland plants adapted to survive with fire, we also adapted to the constant presence of fire in our lives and in our dwellings. Yet, even after all the adaptations made to reduce detrimental, harmful fires in our structures, the National Fire Protection Association states, “Cooking equipment is the leading cause of home structure fires and home fire injuries. Smoking is the leading cause of civilian home fire deaths. Heating equipment is the second most common cause of home fire fatalities.”
There is a fire ecology within and adjacent to our structures. Fire behavior is predictable within a structure and has an effect to the abiotic (building materials, stored materials, synthetic furniture, etc.) and to the biotic (organic materials, living things in dwellings—including us) to the degree of amount and composition of all the flammable—or flame-resistant materials. An example of this is a research study that times the fire behavior in terms of spread and intensity between “legacy” furniture and furnishings compared to “modern” materials. Watch the video and see the differences:
The video documents a study conducted by the Underwriter’s Laboratory (UL) (Kerber 2012). This research documents the much shorter times a structure fire takes to achieve the highly combustible state of flashover compared to some decades ago—less than 5 minutes now vs. over 30 minutes in the past. This is important because firefighters cannot enter a structure when flashover occurs due to extreme danger of heat and smoke. In the past, firefighters had more time to conduct rescues and put out the fire directly.
The UL study cited many reasons for the difference, including houses built with larger, more open spaces and shorter ceilings. The video illustrates the modern synthetic, more flammable furnishings vs. the older, more organic furnishings and the effect on fire behavior. This is an example of structure fire ecology and fire effects on biotic vs. abiotic in a structure environment.
A fire starts when fuel, heat, and oxygen interact together. Remove any one of these and the fire goes out. How a wildland fire behaves—how intense and severe it becomes—is determined by weather, fuel, and topography. The interaction between intensity, severity, and frequency of fire as a disturbance process and vegetation as fuel across a landscape creates different patterns in the successional process, structure, and composition of vegetation, to which some animal species have adapted. Vegetation structure and composition also effects how fire behaves. Successional patterns within and between associations of plants across a landscape also continue in the absence of major disturbances. Landscape patterns created by disturbance or by the absence of disturbance form habitat for opportunistic species.
The fire regime of an area is defined as the historical context for the pattern, frequency, and severity of wildland fire interacting with that area’s topography, weather, and vegetation.
Fire intensity (the amount of energy or heat given off by a forest fire at a specific point in time); severity; the effects of a fire on the environment, including vegetation and soils; and frequency will shape the structure and composition of vegetation across the landscape over time.
Fire regime refers to the nature of fire occurring over long periods (generally hundreds of years) and to the prominent immediate effects of fire that generally characterize an ecosystem.
Fire regimes are patterns of wildland fires that include factors such as frequency, extent, intensity, severity, type, and reason for burning (Figure 8). The role fire plays in an ecosystem varies with the characteristics under which the ecosystem evolved and or adapted.
The interactions of humidity conditions, wind, temperature, fuels, and ignition sources will determine the fire regime (based on fire behavior) for a particular land area. A fire regime is a function of the frequency of fire occurrence, the fire intensity, the fire severity, and the amount of fuel consumed.
Both frequency and intensity of fire vary and are interdependent. Frequency of fire depends on the ignition sources and the duration and character of weather.
Intensity of fire depends on the quantity of fuel available and the fuels’ combustion rates. Wind, topography, and other weather influences, such as temperature and humidity, also affect the interaction between frequency and intensity of fires.
Many components contribute to a wildland fire behavior. One of these components is topography (Figure 9). Fire will generally burn uphill faster than downhill. The steeper the slope and the higher the fuel load, the faster the fire will burn, especially with wind driving the burning. The next topographic component is the breaks in steep terrain.
On saddles (low areas between two higher ridges) and in box canyons, fire moves upslope very rapidly due to a chimney-like preheating of the higher-level fuels and upslope winds. If a canyon is very narrow, radiant heat can raise the temperature of fuels on the opposite slope closer to their ignition temperature. Then fire spotting can more easily propagate multiple ignitions on the other side. Night downdrafts can lower temperatures and increase humidity, slowly moving a fire downhill.
Fuel load and depth can help determine whether a fire ignites, its rate of spread, and its intensity. Fuel load and depth directly relate to vegetation structure and composition. Structure and composition are the result of vegetation adapted to slope, elevation, precipitation, and soil types—and to disturbance succession. As vegetation changes in response to the environmental gradient, fire behavior will also change. Land management—or the absence of it—can create higher or lower fuel loadings than would have happened historically.
Environmental gradients affect structure fires. Homes built in box canyons, on steep slopes (especially south-facing slopes), within strong wind influences, and at the mouth of downwind ravines are much more susceptible to wildland fires or to fires that start in the structure.
The best example of wildland fire dynamics follows a cross-section of Oregon from the Pacific Coast eastward up the slopes of the Coast Range. Continue over the top and down to the Willamette Valley. Pass across the valley and upward against the west slopes of the Cascade Mountain Range and over the top to the eastern slopes. Pass eastward into the Basin and Range flats and ultimately against uplifts typified by the Steens Mountain to the Idaho border (Figure 10). The topographic gradient from west to east affects weather patterns originating from the Pacific Ocean. Vegetation has adapted to this topographic gradient. Vegetation composition and diversity developed in response to changes in elevation, precipitation, and solar radiation with general weather patterns. Fire, once started within this context of weather and topographic influence, will behave with available fuels and burn with intensity and severity until weather or fuels change. These abiotic and biotic elements interact with fire disturbance to shape landscape and local patterns of wildlife habitat.
Here are some capsulated examples of vegetation (as fuel) adaptation to environmental attributes such as: precipitation, slope, aspect, elevation, and solar radiation (and as adapted to fire response and behavior)—going from the Oregon coastline east to the Idaho border:
Wetlands are less likely to burn, and when they do, they burn less severely than upland sites. Breeding and survival for certain wildlife species occurs with little interruption within wetlands that provide a refuge from fire disturbance. Fire in wetlands usually increases areas of open water and stimulates an increase in forage.
Streams, lakes, and meadows can act as firebreaks influencing the spread of the fire. There is inherent moisture in these habitats. Humidity can be higher than the surrounding upland vegetation. Because wetlands are predominantly in lower-elevation terrain than the surrounding upland, cool air drains downward, especially in the evening. Fires can burn in these habitats, but usually not to the intensity and severity as the upland.
Mosaic landscape patterns usually result during a wildland fire (Figure 11). Few fires burn over many acres in one pattern, one intensity, or uniform severity. Mosaic patterns are mixtures of totally burned (with varying intensities and severities) and unburned sections of a landscape within the burn perimeter. This creates a mixture of openings, partial openings, and full-canopy conditions with minor disturbance (Figure 12). This can possibly create forage, hiding cover, and breeding areas for many species of wildlife.
Ash and charcoal from wildfires will drift with the wind and settle on water surfaces, ultimately ending up on the bottom with other sediments. This can produce a record of wildfire intensity and severity over time when sampled.
The degree of heat transfer from the burning fire on the surface directly to the soil is the measure of fire severity. When that transfer is hot enough, the soil’s physical and chemical properties can be altered. Chemicals and nutrients can volatilize.
Plants have adapted as individuals and communities to occupy niches along environmental gradients, such as from moist valley bottoms to dry ridgetops. Weather (solar radiation, precipitation, persistent winds) and topography (slope, elevation, aspect) affect plant adaptations, too, resulting in vegetation structure, composition, and diversity differences along this gradient. There are inherent differences in fuel type: moisture content, size/shape, continuity, and arrangement are a result of these relationships. Plant associations (an aggregation of plants growing together in a given habitat) reacting to persistent or episodic disturbance also alters fuel characteristics. Vegetative species—individually and in association—have developed physiological characteristics in response to disturbance when it’s persistent over a long-enough period.
An example most are familiar with is the USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map. The map is the standard by which gardeners and growers can determine which plants are most likely to thrive at a location. That is nothing more than a climatic and environmental gradient to which plants have adapted. We can grow banana plants anywhere—as long as we provide the proper growing conditions to which it has adapted for survival.
An adaptive trait is a behavior, physical feature, or other characteristic that helps a plant or animal survive and make the most of its habitat. Arrayed across landscapes, aggregations of plants—in the complexes of assemblages, populations, and associations of vegetation communities—are in the process of adapting to the environment. These communities have adapted to moisture (precipitation, water holding capacity), solar radiation (angle of incidence, slope, aspect), and elevation differences that have occurred for a long-enough period for individual adaptations to occur. These factors are the main explanation for why vegetation is where it is on the landscape.
Plant species are not mobile and cannot migrate to adapt to changes in the environment. Species have had a greater need to adapt over time to acquire physiological characteristics in response to repeated fire intensities and frequencies. Tree species such as ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and western larch (Larix occidentalis) are more fire-adapted and sun-tolerant than the shade-tolerant western redcedar (Thula plicata) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) have thick, platy bark adapted to resist fire. Lodgepole pine can establish itself following a high intense fire due to its serotinus cones and mycorrhizae, which allow lodgepole pines to colonize nutrient-poor sites following an intense fire. Snowbrush ceanothus (Ceanothus velutinus) has seeds with a very hard outer layer that needs a high-temperature fire to scarify in order to germinate. These seeds can remain buried in duff for over 200 years until a wildfire occurs. Highly sun-tolerant, shade-intolerant snowbrush can fix nitrogen and disappear when overtopped by tree species.
Plants adapt to varying levels of precipitation, soils, solar radiation (slope and aspect), and elevation even in the absence of disturbance. Plants also adapt to disturbance frequency, intensity, and severity. Depending on the severity and intensity of disturbance, there will be an immediate effect to species and communities and an effect that can last long afterward. In the absence of disturbance, species and communities will proceed through succession, which can result in severely overstocked forests or grasslands. Ecosystems do not remain static with or without disturbance.
Plant communities are not static, even though some may have successional stages that can last for hundreds of years. Plants can shift in structure, composition, and function in response to disturbance and to the absence of disturbance. Plants are opportunists in order to gain a competitive edge and to perpetuate populations. (See Figures 14 and 15)
Snowbrush ceanothus (Ceanothus velutinus) is an example of a fire-adapted species (Figure 16). Adaptations include the production of seed that can be dormant in the duff for hundreds of years until a very hot fire (more than 200oF) scarifies the seed coat, enabling germination.
Ceanothus is very shade intolerant and thrives in open, full-sun conditions following a fire, with roots that fix nitrogen, making it ideal to establish following a severe fire. It is so shade-intolerant that once overtopped by tree species, ceanothus leaves the system until another fire burns through. Ceanothus leaves, twigs, and stems contain volatile waxes or oils, and the thick, leathery leaves have a strong odor when crushed or when exposed to the hot afternoon sun. Sap is gummy, resinous, and has a strong smell. This sap is extremely flammable and burns very hot, making way for other seeds to germinate and produce vigorous plants.
False huckleberry (Menziesia ferruginea) is an example of a non-fire-adapted species
(Figure 17). False huckleberry contrasts with ceanothus in being very shade tolerant (it grows best in 5 percent of full sunlight) and is associated with cool, moist sites on northerly aspects. False huckleberry is fire-resistant with moist, supple leaves. It does not accumulate dry, dead material within the plant. The sap is watery without a strong odor.
Exactly what happens after a fire occurs depends on the landscape, the severity of the fire, and the species involved. The event always sparks a succession of changes as plants, microbes, fungi, and other organisms recolonize the burned land. As trees and plants age, light and other features change—and the composition of creatures in the area changes in response.
Fire changes wildlife habitat. Wildlife habitats, like forests, are not static; they evolve and respond to disturbances, as do other natural systems. Fire changes the proportion, arrangement, and characteristic of habitats across the landscape (Figure 18). Immediately after a fire, there can be a temporary loss of or increase in food and shelter. Animal species are opportunists. Unlike plants, animal species and populations may shift from species that prefer dense forest conditions to ones that prefer warm, open forest conditions. Some animals can leave a burned area that does not suit their needs to an unburned area that does. Unburned areas adjacent to burned areas supply a mosaic of habitats with a range of vegetative conditions from which wildlife can find food and cover. Herbivores and species that prefer herbaceous vegetation for cover prefer the grass/forb habitats or broad-leafed forests that often establish after a burn. Depending on the vegetation type, burning can increase or improve forage for wildlife from a few years to as long as 100 years. In some cases, the nutritional content and digestibility of plants will temporarily increase as well. Fire-killed trees become food for millions of insect larvae, becoming food for species of birds. Snags and downed woody debris also provide important habitat for cavity nesters, reptiles, small mammals, and even large mammals such as bears.
Fire can provide temporal habitat for some wildlife species. Cavity-nesting birds favor high- to moderate-burn severities; open-cup, ground-nesting birds occupy moderate to low severity burn areas; and open-cup, canopy-nesting species favor unburned habitats. Fire-killed trees become food for millions of insect larvae and/or snags that provide perches and feeding sites for many bird species. The black-backed woodpecker is an “eruptive” species, meaning it thrives in response to increased insect population build-up. The black-backed population will increase in response to the insect build-up, but will decrease in number as the insect population decreases. (Figures 19–21)
Humans are a part of the biosphere and connected to most ecological systems around the planet. We have become one of the significant disturbance factors. We can plant vegetation where it would not likely migrate and plant species that would not normally adapt. Trying to gain a mastery over fire or reeling in fear of fire has affected all of us in one way or another. We cannot generate hurricanes or tornados, but we can light a fire for beneficial or destructive purposes.
Our wildland fire suppression efforts are over 90 percent effective, yet thousands of acres burn every year—the 10 percent we can’t suppress. “People have triggered five out of six wildfires in the U.S. over the last two decades, tripling the length of the wildfire season and making it start earlier in the East and last longer in the West, a new study finds. Scientists analyzing fire data from 1992 to 2012 found that 84 percent of all US wildfires—but only 44 percent of the total acres burned—were started by people, either by accident or on purpose. Human-caused blazes have more than tripled the length of the wildfire season from 46 days to 154 days, according to a study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Balch, et al. 2017).
The Florida fires of 1998 were the largest, most destructive and costly seasonal blazes on record. Before settlement of the area, fire was a sustaining force on the coastal prairie. Fires set by lightning fed on the dormant grasses and kept trees in check, while the roots and bulbs of the native prairie plants remained unaffected by fire at the surface. Fire suppression practices, grazing, mowing, and fragmentation of the prairie landscape through agriculture and urban sprawl have all but eliminated wildfire as a dominant factor in the modern coastal prairie ecosystem. (https://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/factshts/018-00.pdf)
“What made the fires of 1998 so devastating, and what is causing the 2007 fires to be so hard to stop, is that despite lots of warnings, we have allowed huge quantities of fuel to accumulate. Plummeting pulpwood prices have spurred industrial forest owners to plant lower densities and thin their stands, but many plantations and forests are still too dense.
Consequently, instead of the creeping surface fires that have burned across Florida for millennia, we now face unstoppable crown fires. Instead of investing in fuel management through controlled burning and fire-preventing treatments such as thinning, we let pine-needle brush collect in tinderboxes of epic proportions.
Some of us remember back in 1998, when the fire bearing down on the town of Waldo was transformed from a raging crown fire to a moderate-intensity understory fire when it reached landowner Clark Smith’s well-managed pinelands. His efforts at ecosystem management through frequent controlled burns saved the town. We need more Clark Smiths, more savannas and open-canopied woodlands, and more preventive action so as to lessen the extent and the power of the wildfires inevitable in Florida. Instead, we have burdensome regulations on controlled burns, native savannas choked by invasive hardwoods, residents who don’t recognize the benefits of frequent low-intensity fires, pines planted as thick as the hair on a dog’s back, massive amounts of fuel, firefighters risking their lives, homeowners losing their home,s and smoke in the air.” (Not learning lessons of ‘98 fires will prove costly. May 20, 2007. Francis E. `Jack’ Putz, Special to the Sentinel)
Working and living with a knowledge of fire ecology and applying the concepts through which these ecosystems adapted over time can only benefit us—and all abiotic components that inhabit these systems with us. We can grow a banana tree anywhere we want and we can place a house anywhere we want. How much we are willing to pay? The consequences we are willing to accept should influence our decisions.
James Agee, in his concluding chapter of Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests (1993, Island Press), states, “Consensus on fire management, however, requires the incorporation of human values, and most past fire management policies have been derived from the view of fire only as a threat, rather than from a broader perspective of values evident in today’s society.”
Benefits we can achieve with judicious management of fire-adapted ecosystems where we live are:
Facilitator should secure a room large enough to comfortably accommodate participants. Organize the room in a U‐shape fashion with long tables and chairs. The room should have a large screen to display the presentation. There should be a large table up front (6 to 8 feet in length) for the instructor to use for in‐class demonstrations and to display various props, such as samples of various trees, shrubs, and forbs.
Approximately 8 hours in the classroom
Class evaluation—Provide a survey for student feedback for each module as a form of formative evaluation.
I. Personal and Professional Insights
Some years ago in northwest Montana, a passing lightning storm ignited a wildfire. It was late in the season, one of those fall storms that had a little rain with it, but still ignited the downed fuel, shrubs, and grass made drier with the early morning frost. The fire occurred on a relatively isolated mountaintop, as lightning fires do and it quickly spread on the south slope warmed by the sun. This part of Montana, west of the Continental Divide and near to the Idaho border, has steep, dissected topography and has an annual precipitation of 60 to 80 inches—much in the form of winter snow. The contrast between north and south aspect is striking. Gain elevation, and even more so. As soon as the local fire lookout reported it, a crew of smokejumpers dispatched to the fire. This crew was busy all during the fire season throughout the southwest and eastside of Montana where fires burned on and off since the previous May.
The smokejumpers landed, designated their Incident Commander (IC), selected their gear and made a quick assessment of the fire conditions—sufficient to set a strategy in place, get the tactics together, and order resources to deal with the fire. While this was happening, a local Type 3 Team was put together to take over the management of the fire.
Meantime, the new Type 3 IC was circling the fire in the local helicopter, doing the initial recon and ready to take over from the smokejumper IC. That’s when the fire, heated by the afternoon sun on that south slope—made its run. The ceanothus from an old fire, the plentiful beargrass, and the clumps of sub-alpine fir (all with high fuel content in the sap) burned hot on contact with the flames and heated the fire to 80-foot scattered and clumped flame lengths as the wind blew up the slope. The smokejumpers retreated to a safety zone off the flank of the fire and the IC ordered air tankers of fire retardant and helicopter buckets of water to stop the flames from going over the ridge into what the smokejumper IC thought could become an escaped, uncontrolled burn that could easily get out of hand. He then ordered six 20-person crews to assist. The local Type 3 IC heard the radio traffic, landed at the nearest helispot, and officially assumed command of the fire with the smokejumper IC’s blessing. The first thing the Type 3 IC did was cancel the air tankers, helicopters, and four of the six crews. Why the change in tactics?
Neither IC was right or wrong—that was not the issue. The smokejumper IC made his calls based on his experience in the Southwest, which has drier, more open burning conditions where most species of vegetation are born to burn. The local Type 3 IC had worked in northwest Montana for years and knew the vegetation, terrain, and other environmental conditions that created the fire response typical for that landscape. At that higher latitude (near the Canadian border) and at that elevation (7,000+ feet), and on steep slopes, the angle of sunlight late in the season and maritime weather influence created fire-adapted species on the south slopes and fire-resistant species on the cooler, more shaded, higher humidity north slope. The false huckleberry was thick on the north slope just over the ridge from the fire—the temperature dropped 20oF, the humidity rose 20 percent. In spite of the wind coming over the ridge, the fire behavior immediately dropped to almost nothing when it crossed on to the north slope. The flanks of the fire also cooled down, making mop-up (after they anchored in) by the two crews that came later that afternoon easy work.
That night, the Type 3 IC ordered a good meal delivered at the old mining camp that served as the Incident Command Post to thank the jumpers, reminisce about bygone fires, enjoy good times with old friends, and feed the crews for the next day’s shift. Later that night and towards the early morning, the storms driven by westerly/northwesterly winds dropped over an inch of rain and snow. The fire season had officially ended for that year and everyone went home—safe and sound.
II. Fire Adaptations
Discuss plant, animal, and ecosystem adaptations to fire, fire history, and fire regimes—and why all are different across an environmental gradient.
III. Local Fire Ecology
IV. Fire Ecology Crossword
V. Fire Effects Information System (FEIS)
VI. Fire Ecology Field Trip
(Questions and Answers)
Answer: Biotic: any living organism(s). Abiotic: any nonliving components of the planet. Examples of biotic: Snowbrush ceanothus and black-back woodpeckers. Examples of abiotic: soils and rocks.
Answer: In photosynthesis, plants take energy from the sun, carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and water from the soil to produce plant-building materials, while releasing oxygen back into the atmosphere. Combustion is the process where carbon-based living or non-living fuel ignites, producing heat and releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Answer: Fire-dependent species: whitebark pine. Fire-adapted species: ponderosa pine.
Answer: Fire regimes are patterns of wildland fires taking place over long periods of time that include factors such as frequency, extent, intensity, severity, type, and reason for burning.
Answer: Florence, Oregon across the state, east to the Idaho border—the state of Oregon in a transect east from the Pacific Ocean to the Idaho border.
Answer: The human variety.
Adaptation: An alteration in structure or function of a plant or animal that helps it change over the course of successive generations in order to be better suited to live in its environment.
Biological diversity: The sum total of all living organisms and the interaction thereof.
Ecosystem: An area in which energy, nutrients, water, and other biological and geological influences, including all living organisms, work together and influence one another.
Fire community: A plant or animal community that is adapted to live in a habitat frequented by fires.
Fire Dependent Ecosystems: Plants or plant communities that rely on fire as one mechanism to create the optimal situation for their survival.
Fuel load: The amount of combustible material (living and dead plants and trees) found in an area.
Habitat: An area that supplies the needs of a population of animals or plants living there.
Humus layer: Decomposed organic matter that is found in the top layer of soil.
Mechanical treatments: The use of people or machines to thin or reduce the density of live and dead trees and plants.
Predators: Animals that prey on other animals as a food source.
Prescribed fire: The planned application of fire to fuels, including logging debris, grasslands and/or understory vegetation, such as palmettos, in order to meet outlined resource management objectives.
Scavengers: Animals that feed on dead or dying animals or discarded materials from human societies.
Serotinous: A pinecone or other seed case that requires heat from a fire to open and release the seed.
Succession: The gradual replacement of one plant and animal community by another, as in the change from an open field to a mature forest.
Wildland Fire Use: A commonly used term to indicate a policy of allowing naturally ignited fires, such as those started by lightning, to burn while being closely monitored to meet specific management objectives without initial fire suppression.
Wildfire: Unplanned fire burning in natural (wildland) areas such as forests, shrub lands, grasslands, or prairies.
Wildlands: Forests, shrub lands, grasslands, and other vegetation communities not significantly modified by agriculture or human development. A more specific meaning for fire managers, used by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group (which coordinates programs of participating wildfire management agencies nationwide), refers to an area in which development is essentially non-existent (except for roads, railroads, power lines, and similar transportation facilities); structures, if any, are widely scattered.
Agee, J, 1993. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press,
Balch, J.K., B.A. Bradley, J.T. Abatzoglou, R.C. Nagy, E.J. Fusco, and A.L. Mahood. Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States. 2017. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 no. 11: 2,946–2,951.
Barbier, N. 2015. The Controversial Management of Fire in the National Forests of Idaho and Western Montana. Journal of Alpine Research, 103–4.
Cissel, J.H., F.J. Swanson and P.J. Weisberg. 1999. Landscape management using historical fire regimes: Blue River, Oregon. Ecological Applications. 9(4): 1217–1231. (Pub No: 2502)
Coastal vegetation and plant ecology: http://oregonexplorer.info/content/coastal-vegetation-and-plant-ecology?topic=11278&ptopic=98. Oregon Explorer Natural Resources Digital Library, Oregon State University Libraries and Press and Institute for Natural Resources. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Detweiler, A.J. 2006. Fire-Resistant Plants for Home Landscapes (PNW 590), Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, Oregon. 48 pp.
Fire behavior triangle: (https://learn.weatherstem.com/modules/learn/lessons/121/12.html). WeatherSTEM lesson PowerPoint (slide 12 of 24). Copyright 2017 by WeatherSTEM (3019 North Shannon, Lakes Drive, Suite 203, Tallahassee, Florida. Used with permission.
Fire Triangle: http://www.pslc.ws/fire/howwhy/triangle.htm. Polymer Science Learning Center, University of Southern Mississippi. Accessed 6/15/2015. Used with permission.
Fitzgerald, S. 2005. Fire Ecology of Ponderosa Pine and the Rebuilding of Fire-Resilient Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-198.
Florida fires of 1998: (https://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/factshts/018-00.pdf). Fire Ecology in the Southeastern United States. 2000. USGS FS-018-00. U.S. Geological Survey/National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette, LA. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Formula for photosynthesis: (http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/540carbohydrates.html). Virtual Chembook, Emhurst College. Charles E. Ophardt, 2003. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Formula for combustion: (http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/540carbohydrates.html). Virtual Chembook, Emhurst College. Charles E. Ophardt, 2003. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Fukarek, F; Hempel, I; Hûbel, G; Sukkov, R; Schuster, M. 1982. Flora of the Earth (in Russian). 2. Moscow: Mir. 261 p.
Historical Vegetation in West Eugene. City of Eugene, Oregon, Parks and Open Space, 1820 Roosevelt Blvd., Eugene, Oregon. https://www.eugene-or.gov/1763/Historical-Vegetation-in-West-Eugenected. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Kerber, S. 2012. Analysis of Changing Residential Fire Dynamics and Its Implications on Firefighter Operational Timeframes. Fire Technology, October 2012. 48, no. 4: 865–891.
Kessel, S.R. and W.C. Fisher. 1981. Predicting post-fire plant succession for fire management planning. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rept. Int-91.
King fire maps California severity maps. https://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/map/4126/0/40958/. InciWeb Incident Information System, Eldorado National Forest, USDA Forest Service. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Laurina Manning artistic rendering of an Oregon gradient. Student project for Biology 410 (Amphibians and Reptiles of Oregon), taught by Dr. Tom Titus, University of Oregon. http://pages.uoregon.edu/titus/herp/herp.html. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Leavell, D. Vegetation and process of the Kootenai National Forest. 2000. School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT n: dissertation abstracts, catalog #9970-793, vol. 6l-04B, p.1744. Ann Arbor, Michigan. 508 pp.
University of Montana, Missoula, MT. In: dissertation abstracts, catalog #9970-793, vol. 6l-04B, p. 1744. Ann Arbor, Michigan. 508 pp.
Morrison, P.H. and F.J. Swanson. 1990. Fire history and pattern in a Cascade Range landscape. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-254
Pfister, Robert D., Kovalchik, Bernard L., Arno, Stephen F., Presby, Richard C. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-34. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest & Range Experiment Station. 174 pp.
Putz, F.E. Not learning lessons of ’98 fires will prove costly. 2007. Francis E. `Jack’ Putz, Special to the Orlando Sentinel. http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2007-05-20/news/FIRE20_1_fires-forest-service-lightning-capital.
Smith, R.L. 1990. Ecology and field biology, 4th ed., HarperCollins Pub., NY, NY. 922 pp.
Succession: Biological Progression. 2006. Enclyclopedia Britannica, online. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/science/ecological-succession.
Teensma, Peter D.A. 1987. Fire history and fire regimes of the Central Western Cascades of Oregon: PhD. dissertation, Department of Geography, August, 1987. University of Oregon.
Temperature of the atmosphere gradient: (https://sites.google.com/site/climatetypes/highland). Climate Types for Kids webpage, “What are the temperatures like?” Accessed 6/15/2015.
USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map: http://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/PHZMWeb/. 2012. USDA Agricultural Research Service and Oregon State University PRISM Climate Group. Accessed 6/15/2015.
Weisberg, P.J. 1998. Fire history, fire regimes and development of forest structure in the central Western Oregon Cascades. PhD Dissertation, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.